<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chinese Green Dam Porn Blocker May Be Security Risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/06/16/chinese-green-dam-porn-blocker-may-be-security-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/06/16/chinese-green-dam-porn-blocker-may-be-security-risk/</link>
	<description>Digital &#38; Satellite TV, 3DTV, HDTV, IPTV, Computers, Mobiles, Gaming, Internet, and Telecoms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:04:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Liu</title>
		<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/06/16/chinese-green-dam-porn-blocker-may-be-security-risk/#comment-5113</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Liu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 02:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.securitywatch.co.uk/?p=1497#comment-5113</guid>
		<description>Alan, your story is way off base. There&#039;s no chip. Not even the filtering software in question is required.

How can there be censorship when end users aren&#039;t even required to install or run this software?

&quot;preinstall&quot; in Chinese means &quot;bundle&quot;. The PC makers were asked to bundle the software with new computers, while  end users were never reuqired to install or run Green Dam.

Take this 6/12 ZDNet article citing WSJ:

http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=19688

As to what Green Dam will filter, it is configuable by the user. And it&#039;s only a content filter, not a replacement for conventional safeguards (AV, firewall). How can this be twisted into censorship or cyber terrorism is beyond me - perhaps anti-sinoism?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, your story is way off base. There&#8217;s no chip. Not even the filtering software in question is required.</p>
<p>How can there be censorship when end users aren&#8217;t even required to install or run this software?</p>
<p>&#8220;preinstall&#8221; in Chinese means &#8220;bundle&#8221;. The PC makers were asked to bundle the software with new computers, while  end users were never reuqired to install or run Green Dam.</p>
<p>Take this 6/12 ZDNet article citing WSJ:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=19688" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/BTL/?p=19688</a></p>
<p>As to what Green Dam will filter, it is configuable by the user. And it&#8217;s only a content filter, not a replacement for conventional safeguards (AV, firewall). How can this be twisted into censorship or cyber terrorism is beyond me &#8211; perhaps anti-sinoism?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

