Twitter by name, twit by nature
by Darren Allan

A leading psychologist from Stirling University has suggested that using Twitter could have a negative effect on the brain.
According to Dr Tracy Alloway, Twitter is bad for the human memory because its endless stream of bite-sized updates doesn’t allow users to fully process or engage with what they’re reading.
YouTube also came under fire, with Alloway citing the tiny length of the video clips as a factor in helping reduce children’s attention span, which is unhelpful given the growing problem of Attention Deficit Disorder afflicted youngsters.
On a more positive note, she said that using sites such as Facebook might have the opposite effect, as the social environment and more involved updates means that people have to hold a lot more information in their memory.
We’d agree to a point; the sense of community Facebook provides is certainly laudable, although users’ status updates can still be pretty bite-sized.
We just can’t see much brain development resulting from poring over a screen-full of: “Gemma is eating a sandwich.” Or: “Fred has taken the ‘How much time can you waste at work’ quiz.”
Story link: Twitter by name, twit by nature
Discuss this in the Techwatch Forums
Related news to "Twitter by name, twit by nature"
1 Comment »
Previous: « Free broadband from T Mobile
Next: Slim PS3 sells a bundle »
Visited 1150 times, 1 so far today
Yeah, and passengers travelling on Stephenson’s Rocket could be expected to die from lack of air at speeds over 28mph…
Comment by Alastair McKenzie — September 7, 2009 @ 7:06 pm