|
||||||||||
| Satellite Help Anything satellite related |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Sussex coast
Posts: 108
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
I'm soon to start decorating our lounge and this will mean the coaxs from the dishes will be buried in the wall so this is my last chance to try and screw every last uV from the fringe signals.
Currently the feed from the big dish is an old but good condition run of what looks like Raydex CT100, thick foil and good amounts of braid although the foil looks to have a few ripples in it, probably where it's been coiled and uncoiled over the years. Is it worth shelling out on 15m of CT125 to replace this, I'm guessing there is quite a bit of gain on the Inverto BU so I'm not actually sure I'll gain much by changing the coax to something slightly less lossy? There is at the moment an F socket faceplate that the CT100 terminates on and a CT125 patch lead into the sat card, how much loss is there on these things and do they ever cause odd effects at certain frequencies? I've got enough slack in the roof that I could remove the socket and feed the cable through the front of the plate and connect it directly to the card if it's worth doing. If I had some spare CT125 I'd make up a long lead and compare results but as I don't I'm wondering if anyone has practical experience of comparing coax's on shortish runs? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Installer/Design Engineer
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 359
Thanks: 16
Thanked 78 Times in 74 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
..Satellite Installer-.. Cheshire/ Manchester/ Staffs/ Derbyshire/ N Wales/ Shrops/ Yorks/ Notts...motorised & fixed, small, medium & BIG
|
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to pedro2000uk For This Useful Post: | AceB (10-01-11) |
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: East Sussex coast
Posts: 108
Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
Useful info Pedro, thanks. I did say this CT100 was old but didn't realise it wasn't made anymore lol I'll look out for some WF125.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Installer/Design Engineer
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 359
Thanks: 16
Thanked 78 Times in 74 Posts
|
I have it from a long standing cable supplier that the name is still used but the original company has changed - we don't use a cable of that name now but the Triax coax is about what is referred to as CT100 CT125 etc.. as are many others
__________________
..Satellite Installer-.. Cheshire/ Manchester/ Staffs/ Derbyshire/ N Wales/ Shrops/ Yorks/ Notts...motorised & fixed, small, medium & BIG
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
cable, coax, ct100, ct125 ![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SV6 is it worth getting one | wayne1 | Starview | 13 | 12-09-10 10:45 PM |
| is it worth it | philly-d | PC Hardware | 3 | 19-08-10 09:18 AM |
| Replace the coax?? | carraig | Satellite Help | 5 | 14-07-10 06:42 PM |
| is it worth it | cable man | Cable Modems | 2 | 29-05-10 11:50 AM |
| thinking of getting my box done is it worth it | caspercarl | Other Cable Boxes | 3 | 24-05-10 10:32 PM |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |
| Bookmark & Share |
Digg this Thread! |
Add Thread to del.icio.us |
Bookmark in Technorati |
Tweet this thread |
