|
||||||||||
| Kryptview Discussions on the Kryptview cable boxes. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Super-Dooper Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: In front of the PC
Posts: 6,002
Thanks: 8
Thanked 2,580 Times in 667 Posts
|
Have another read of what the Coder wrote:
Quote:
__________________
Blade7000 & DM800Pro/SE in Stock, Linux Sat boxes from £52.25, SkyboxF3 under £60. Kryptview £123.50 & SV6 under £72 with Members Discount - Lincsat's Nick-Nacks (Shop) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Underground Crew Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Undrground
Posts: 2,149
Thanks: 15
Thanked 1,691 Times in 933 Posts
|
Quote:
VM try to set things up so that all transducers emit the same power levels but the problems mostly occur later as different frequencies exhibit different properties as they travel through the local cable runs and connecters. In extreme cases you can end up with signal levels on some frequencies being 1/3rd or less than some other frequencies. The VM network itself is also a mish-mash of many smaller networks (remember the situation 10-15 years ago before VM) with each network having settled on its own idea of what constitutes the 'perfect' setup. For instance, parts of the exTW network run with particularly low signal levels, even before any losses. The tuners in most 3rd party boxes were originally designed for the European market where signal levels are a lot more standardised and consistant (and generally higher than uk signal levels). That makes these tuners more likely to be working at the limits of their capabilites. They will work most of the time but not in all circumstances. The tuners for both the later SV/KV boxes were apparently tweaked somewhat to allow them to operate more consistantly in the UK but they are still not as good as the custom tuners used in VM's own subscription boxes. You may wonder why SV/KV etc dont use custom tuners the answer to which is basically expense. A custom tuner would likely of added £20 to the base cost of such boxes (the cost of developing the tuner would of run into the tens of thousands of pounds, which would have to be recovered plus the greater cost of purchase of the individual tuners (if manufacturers aren't making 100,000 of the things, they cost a lot more per item). So, is the tuner weak ? Answer - not really, its in spec just not the same spec as some parts of the vm network. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheCoder For This Useful Post: | unadkat (08-02-12), waqasahmed (06-02-12) |
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Underground Crew Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Undrground
Posts: 2,149
Thanks: 15
Thanked 1,691 Times in 933 Posts
|
Quote:
For exCW/exTW areas, they tend to transmit the NIT's for all NetID's for those areas. From any exTW/exCW area you should be able to build a list of all frequencies used in any other exCW/exTW region. ExNTL regions are somewhat different as they were based on somewhat different standards (DAVIC rather than DOCSIS). Generally the exNTL regions only transmit a single NIT, which is the correct NIT for that area. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheCoder For This Useful Post: | unadkat (08-02-12), waqasahmed (06-02-12) |
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |
|
Underground Crew Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Undrground
Posts: 2,149
Thanks: 15
Thanked 1,691 Times in 933 Posts
|
Quote:
If your lowst signal level is still within the capability of the tuner then you'll likely have little problem. On the other hand, if your box simply wont pich up a certain transponder or the signal levels are particularly low at a certain transponder frequency then you may have a problem. It may be possible to 'fix' the problem using tuned 'compensator' (a sort of tuned filter) but such a thing really needs some complex equipment to do properly. A 'booster' amplifier may get you there but it may also make things worse. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to TheCoder For This Useful Post: | unadkat (08-02-12) |
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Underground Crew Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Undrground
Posts: 2,149
Thanks: 15
Thanked 1,691 Times in 933 Posts
|
The transponders really have little to do with the server. In fact, the servers on large CS systems have absolutely no knowledge of transponders. Such associations are only useful for small 'home' based CS systems (as in dreambox type servers). Dont mix the two systems up as they function in very different ways !
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to TheCoder For This Useful Post: | unadkat (08-02-12) |
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 167
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() And if TPs change in my area, will I be able to get the channels back by doing a Rescan? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Box stop working | V4vintage | Starview | 33 | 11-06-11 09:39 PM |
| Hotpoint WF440 flashing problem | 01484 | DIY | 2 | 14-02-11 06:46 PM |
| Windows 7 Ultimate Ethernet Problem | 01484 | PC Software | 3 | 04-02-11 09:15 PM |
| Up AndvDown more times than a slags drawers | jambutty | Kryptview | 25 | 11-11-10 11:46 AM |
| Toshiba blue screen problem | abaaba | Laptops | 3 | 09-10-10 10:57 PM |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |
| Bookmark & Share |
Digg this Thread! |
Add Thread to del.icio.us |
Bookmark in Technorati |
Tweet this thread |
