|
Technology Forums: FTA, Satellite, Cable, Home Media, Hardware & Computers
|
|
|
|
||||||
| Register | Members List | Search | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Sony Cameras Sony cameras and camcorders, film, digital, HD and DVD: including Sony HC3/HC5/HC7, Sony HVR-Z1, HDR-FX-1, 3CCD, HDR-UX1, HDR-UX7 Avchd, DCR DVD305, 505, Pd170, vx2100, Pdx10 and other Dvcam cameras |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I found japanese websheets with comparison of hc7 and hv20.
Canon HV20: http://www.google.com/translate?u=ht...&hl=en&ie=UTF8 Sony HC7: http://www.google.com/translate?u=ht...&hl=en&ie=UTF8 |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle, Earth, Milky Way, the 4D Universe
Posts: 171
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
HC5 sharpness is similar to HC3, which is just a little sharper than the DV. HC7 on the other hand is even sharper than HC1 (the very first HDV Camcorder, I owned it. So far only Canon HV10 matched the quality of HC1) Check out effective pixels compared: HDR-HC1 Video Actual: 1983K Pixels (16:9); HDR-HC3 Video Actual: 1434K Pixels (16:9); HDR-HC5 Video Actual: 1430K Pixels (16:9); HDR-HC7 Video Actual: 2280K Pixels (16:9); Canon HV10 Video Actual: 2070K Pixels (16:9) Sony FX-7 Video Actual: 1037K Pixels (16:9) So, there you have it. HC7 is the best of the bunch if you are looking for the sharpest picture. Lowlight is OK, could be better. Overall, HC7 is the best of the bunch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 (permalink) | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle, Earth, Milky Way, the 4D Universe
Posts: 171
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Better?
Not necessarily, unless you like crisp images. With less effective pixels you get HD, but the soft and blurry kind of HD. With more pixels you get sharp, "too much skin detail" kind of picture. The difference between 2280K and 1430K is 850,000 pixels. About 40% of final HD output, 1920*1080=2,073,600 HC7 downsamples a bit which is always a good thing. HC5 "makes up" the missing pixels- BAD! Go figure~ |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: France
Posts: 123
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Final output is what is regitered to the tape and actual generation mpeg2 hd camcorders will only use 1440 1080 (square pixels in 4/3 format that are streched horizontaly to fit 16/9 format) and this rule is true even if the cmos is capting higher r?solution and this is due to get 1h hd video (around 12 gigas) on a tape (at higher resolution 1h video will be around 18 to 20 gigas that cant be squeezed in a normal tape unless compressed and the tape mecanisme has tu turn faster with more drop outs probably ).
That does not mean that higher resolution Cmos like canon hv20wont make better videos ( a comparative resolution chart will probably be available on camcorderinfo.com when hv20 will be tested ) |
|
|
|
|
|
#27 (permalink) |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Raleigh, North Carolina
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
This may be a silly question but I am curious to know if there is there a way to view the entire pixel amount (raw) that the HC7 is capable of on a HD lCD. I have the 30in Apple Cinema LCD and would love to see a video at higher than 1080i if possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#29 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle, Earth, Milky Way, the 4D Universe
Posts: 171
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
HDVSplit will preview video at full resolution. MediaPlayer Classic plays full frame video. (right click- video frame-normal size) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#30 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: France
Posts: 123
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Have been reading that here is a display size factor for percieved resolution (dont remember location) : In summery you will need a very big screen to be able to differentiate very high resolution; I think you can get such information through key word search on google (perceived resolution display or plasme size. I'll be looking for that)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Don't wanna pay... | Serg | Satellite Radio & GPS | 5 | 27-01-06 07:49 PM |
| Ok for me | LRArt | Mobile Phones | 1 | 07-01-06 06:50 AM |
| Switching to Verizon | Serg | Mobile Phones | 5 | 05-01-06 01:19 PM |