Technology Forums: FTA, Satellite, Cable, Home Media, Hardware & Computers
|  Home   |  Forums   |  News   |  Blog   |  

Go Back   Techwatch: Satellite TV forums, FTA, Cable, Hardware, & Tech forums > Home Digital > Digital Cameras > Panasonic Cameras


 

Register Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Panasonic Cameras Panasonic digital cameras and video recorders, including DVX100, 102 Cameras, AG-HVX200 Minidv/ HD/P2 Camera, GS300, GS400, GS500 , GS320, SD Camcorders, SDR S10 to SDR-S150, AVCHD - AGHSC1U.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-03-07, 04:11 AM   #11 (permalink)
1424241
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

When I heard about the new AVCHD format, I almost ran out and bought an sr1 or sd1, then I heard about the editting issues and because I didn't have time to wait for software to come out, I bought a Canon XL1s. Anyone know how long it will be now before some software comes out? A lot of people say April but no one seems to be sure.
1424241 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-07, 08:43 AM   #12 (permalink)
lucian777
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

AVCHD i think is better!
lucian777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-07, 08:01 AM   #13 (permalink)
alexar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default SD1 vs HC7

Hi,
I am going to buy HD camcorder, and being computer guy SD1 (solid state media, no moving parts, weight) looks pretty inviting.
I can wait a couple of months to get new software able to edit AVCHD files, and my next PC anyhow will be strong enough, just because of industry trends.
I plan to do family/vacations movies, so most probably nobody will ever look at it except myself
What do you think - HC7 (old good HVD, tapes, etc) or SD1 (3CCD, SD) ?
Price difference is not an issue.
alexar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-07, 08:10 AM   #14 (permalink)
lovehateHDV
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle, Earth, Milky Way, the 4D Universe
Posts: 171
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Have you seen this?

From what I see it's the worst HD camcorder of all of them. Resolution is HORRIBLE!

look fo yourself.


http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content...erformance.htm
lovehateHDV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-07, 09:03 AM   #15 (permalink)
lucian777
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I'm going to buy a Sanyo hd1a , The price is 559 $. i saw that is not so good in low light situations, but the size...is preaty small for an HD camera and mp4 is a smple file to use compare to .mts .What do you think about this camera?
lucian777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-07, 09:55 AM   #16 (permalink)
wuzabeeb
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bideford Devon UK
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Editing AVCHD is available through Edius 4 Broadcast utility that is a free download. It converts the file format I think. Vegas 7.0d is also supposed to be supporting the format.
wuzabeeb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-07, 11:09 AM   #17 (permalink)
lucian777
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smile

you need a super comuter to convert avchd format.....
Intel? Pentium? 4 3.0GHz CPU or faster (Intel Xeon?2.8GHz dual processors recommended for HD/HDV editing, Hyper-Threading supported)
512MB RAM (1GB RAM recommended)
300MB free disk space for the application
Windows? XP Home or Windows? XP Professional (Service Pack 2 or later)
DirectX 9.0 or later Graphics card with hardware-based DirectDraw overlay and 32-bit color display at a 1024x768 resolution (128MB of graphics memory is required when editing in HD resolution)
ATA100/5400rpm or faster hard disk recommended (Ultra SCSI 160 or better is required for playing two or more uncompressed video streams

Sorry but to take a 20 min of footage i have to do all this. I agree the avchd is a fine quality format but who really needs it for a small family movie.
I have finished with the mini dv that took me half a day to copy and then to compress and now this avchd format for who i need to buy a super fast computer an throw my 1 year old laptop. Sorry for my english!
lucian777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-07, 11:17 AM   #18 (permalink)
alexar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

From
http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content...Conclusion.htm:

Conclusion
If you travel in high society and want to make a statement, then this is the camcorder for you. It looks like a camcorder that millionaires would choose – small, sleek and stylish — and the video is not bad if you don’t look at it closely. I suspect it is targeted for society moms who can appreciate a designer camcorder. However, video enthusiasts would be better off sticking with HDV for a recording format. The video quality is better and the prices are lower.

Still I'd like to see the footage ...
But now it looks less attractive than before
alexar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-07, 11:24 AM   #19 (permalink)
alexar
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lucian777 View Post
you need a super comuter to convert avchd format.....
Intel? Pentium? 4 3.0GHz CPU or faster (Intel Xeon?2.8GHz dual processors recommended for HD/HDV editing, Hyper-Threading supported)
512MB RAM (1GB RAM recommended)
300MB free disk space for the application
Windows? XP Home or Windows? XP Professional (Service Pack 2 or later)
DirectX 9.0 or later Graphics card with hardware-based DirectDraw overlay and 32-bit color display at a 1024x768 resolution (128MB of graphics memory is required when editing in HD resolution)
ATA100/5400rpm or faster hard disk recommended (Ultra SCSI 160 or better is required for playing two or more uncompressed video streams

Sorry but to take a 20 min of footage i have to do all this. I agree the avchd is a fine quality format but who really needs it for a small family movie.
I have finished with the mini dv that took me half a day to copy and then to compress and now this avchd format for who i need to buy a super fast computer an throw my 1 year old laptop. Sorry for my english!
About PC requirements:
The PC that I have now is pretty similar, and is 2 years old, I think.
SATA disks, 1 GB RAM, 3GHz CPU. Next one will be 2 GB RAM, more disks, and dual core - even if I won't need to do avchd conversion.
I am not sure about video cards, but the price difference is not too high, and in my case it is deductible from taxes, so who cares ?
I also do not plan to work on it on my laptop (it is really too weak for this kind of work).
So, the CPU power is not the problem. The picture quality and easyness of working with films does matter. So far I get an impression HC7 is better suited for my need.
alexar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-07, 11:48 AM   #20 (permalink)
lucian777
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 11
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

after 30 min of hard working to play this kind of format a saw a footage made with SD1 ,IT'S NOT SO IMPRESIVE compare with SONY hdv ! So why can i struggle with an avchd format? ps if panasonic wants to sell SD1 they should give for free a E6400 CPU! to work with svchd format. I just need to buy a new camera not a state of art computer to play a movie.
lucian777 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.