Technology Forums: FTA, Satellite, Cable, Home Media, Hardware & Computers
|  Home   |  Forums   |  News   |  Blog   |  

Go Back   Techwatch: Satellite TV forums, FTA, Cable, Hardware, & Tech forums > Home Digital > Digital Cameras > Canon Cameras


 

Register Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Canon Cameras Canon digital cameras and video recorders, including HV10 and HV20 Single CMOS, and Canon XH-A1 , XH-G1, XL-H1 camcorders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-03-07, 04:01 PM   #11 (permalink)
edthesped
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lovehateHDV View Post
2cents.


HC7 had VERY positive reviews, until it came out.

and then suddenly everybody noticed that the amount of noise the cam produced in twilight overshadowed all of the good stuff about. It's still one of the best cams so far, but not without it's downsides.

HV20 could be the same thing.
Would you mind posting a link to some of these reviews? I have to have a video camera in hand by 3/25/07. At this point it seems that the HC7 is the way to go. Excessive low light noise would be a deal killer for me. At this point I feel I must choose btween the HV10 and the HC7. The HV20 looks appealing but I just can't wait till April. Also, the ability to get an underwater housing for the HC7 for ~$200 is mighty appealing.
edthesped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-07, 01:39 AM   #12 (permalink)
lovehateHDV
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle, Earth, Milky Way, the 4D Universe
Posts: 171
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Take a look at this clip. Change to .m2t after download.

http://media.dvinfo.net/sony/hdrhc7LL.m2x

This is shot with locked exposure. If it suits you- go for it, the picture seems sharp for lowlight. (At least it doesn't loose resolution like HC1 & 3)

I'd turn down the COLOR to get rid of chroma noise.
lovehateHDV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 01:29 AM   #13 (permalink)
sszudzik
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mk_sullivan View Post
I can think of 3 reasons to use LANC where a IR remote would not cut it:

1. Tripod with start/stop & Zoom control build into the handle. I have a fairly cheap<$60 tripod I take on trips that has this feature and you would not believe how much better your footage will be. Even on a tripod, if you have your hands on the cam to start/stop and zoom, they will make noise and shake the camera. A stout tripod and no zooming will make this less of an issue, but if you are following action, your hand will be on the tripod handle.

2. Underwater housing. Many underwater housings use LANC to control the camera. They have waterproof electric switches that control camera functions. The other option is to have mechanical plungers that actuate buttons on the camera. However the plungers have to be custom for each camera and they may not be where you would want them for underwater work.

3. Remote start/stop. The Canon has analog video in. This is great for connecting to a helmet camera or other external source. If you have a LANC port you can have a remote button to start & stop recording. The standard setup is to put the camcorder in your backpack, the helmet cam on your helmet and run a remote switch with recording indicator light near or on your hand so you can start and stop recording without digging into your backpack and pulling out the camera. That get's tricky when you are on the road or the camera is in a waterproof housing.

I'd have a HV20 reserved right now if it had LANC. Sony's HC-7 doesn't have analog in, but I will use my old (LANC equiped) SD camcorder for the helmet cam type aplications so I can get along without that. The tripod and underwater/wet situations are too important to me. If Canon made some sort of housing for the <$250 price of the Sony housing, I'd be all over it.

I'm really bummed about the LANC thing. I really wan't the Canon, but it just won't be able to do what I need. (sob)
Makes sense in regards to the underwater rigging your talking about. I'll be using a tripod with mine as well, but is it really that big of a difference to have the remote in your hand while your moving the tripod handle? Could always find a decent way to mount it on there if it becomes a big issue.

I can undestand about the other scenario as well, with the remote possibly not having the indicator lights to let you know whether it's recordign etc.. Very good points.

--Steve
sszudzik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 02:40 AM   #14 (permalink)
edthesped
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lovehateHDV View Post
Take a look at this clip. Change to .m2t after download.

http://media.dvinfo.net/sony/hdrhc7LL.m2x

This is shot with locked exposure. If it suits you- go for it, the picture seems sharp for lowlight. (At least it doesn't loose resolution like HC1 & 3)

I'd turn down the COLOR to get rid of chroma noise.
The clip looks mighty fine to me. Is this from the HV10?
edthesped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 02:49 AM   #15 (permalink)
lovehateHDV
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle, Earth, Milky Way, the 4D Universe
Posts: 171
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

"mighty fine"

I like that.

HC7.
lovehateHDV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 02:58 AM   #16 (permalink)
edthesped
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 23
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lovehateHDV View Post
"mighty fine"

I like that.

HC7.
I realize this may be the wrong forum. How do you like the HC7? At this point I am leaning heavily towards it.
edthesped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 03:02 AM   #17 (permalink)
lovehateHDV
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Seattle, Earth, Milky Way, the 4D Universe
Posts: 171
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Read that forum.

Plenty of opinions.

I am waiting for HV20, just to compare the two, but HC7 is my best bet for now.
lovehateHDV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-07, 07:04 PM   #18 (permalink)
sashimiboy
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

both of them are nice cameras but i want to wait for the hv20
sashimiboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-07, 02:30 AM   #19 (permalink)
hokosuse
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Running on a time constraint. Need a camcorder by May. Need reviews badly!
hokosuse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-07, 12:36 PM   #20 (permalink)
Sebsche
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

go for the hv-20, definetly better specs
Sebsche is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
T300 LRArt Mobile Phones 3 04-02-06 06:10 AM
V180 LRArt Mobile Phones 3 04-02-06 05:59 AM
amazing amplifier! llesra Home Media 1 17-01-06 12:26 AM
Digital Rebel (300D) overexposing images Random Digital Cameras 0 05-01-06 10:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.