|
||||||||||
| Cable Modems Gotta start somewhere and here's the place to start :) |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Technology Forums
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: sbhacker.net
Posts: 974
Thanks: 2
Thanked 251 Times in 173 Posts
|
50mb wont be getting "hacked" you will need 100% cloned modem (i.e. physical access to the modem you want to clone).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 62
Thanks: 4
Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts
|
Quote:
VM's 50mb broadband uses the new Docsis 3.0 specifications. The old sysyem... As most of us know, when a non 50mb modem connects to the VM network all VM check for is that the modems unique MAC address is in their database of paying customers and if so they send it a configuration file to tell it what speed it works at and all is hunky dorey. It is possible to use software to listen to all the broadcasted traffic on your network and 'sniff' out other modems MAC addresses and some basic information about them. So as we know, all that VM check is that the MAC address of the cable modem is registered with them as a paying customer. Normally the MAC address is not user-changable. However, by using modified firmware the MAC address of the modem can be changed to whatever you want, ie: a MAC address of a paying customer, effectivly cloning their modem. Due to Network desgin you cannot have 2 devices with the same MAC address on the same portion of the network (UBR), but you can have them on different UBR's, hence cloners using a mac address from a different area. Now in theory, VM should be able to see all of the cloned modems on their network, due to the modified firmware, most of them cannot be turned off, and tracing them to an exact location, while not impossible is time consuming and no doubt expensive. If they killed the MAC address that has been cloned and changed the MAC address of the original subscribers modem to a new one, this would stop the cloned modem working. Well at least until the owner of the cloned modem changed its MAC address to one of another paying subscriber. And since MAC addresses can just be 'sniffed out.' It really is very difficult to stop this. Now you can see the problem with the old system, and how difficult it is for VM to keep up with cloning, hence why people getting prosecuted for cloned modems is very rare. Docsis 3.0 - The future Now that we can see the inherant problems with the original system and how time consuming, costly it would be for VM to stay on-top of cloned modems lets take a look at how their new system works, and why at least in theory it should be much harder to clone. When a 50mb+ (Docsis 3.0) modem boots up it sends its MAC address to VM just like the original modems. And in theory the MAC address should still be sniffable to anyone on the same UBR due to it being broadcast over the network. However, this MAC address alone isn't enough to allow a Docsis 3.0 modem network access, I still havn't fully read-up on the subject yet or read the Docsis 3.0 specification but there is extra authentication that goes on between VM and the modem that cannot be sniffed out without physical access to the modem. Wether this extra information can just be dumped from the modem or is encrypted I do not know either, but even if it is dumpable. Cloning a Docsis 3.0 modem requires phsyical access to the original modem. The rest of this is just conjecture based on the above Since this is much harder to do than trade just a MAC address there will be less cloned modems on the network as sellers won't be selling 'almost ready to go' modems on eBay where all a user has to do is put in a few letters and numbers. This should make it a hell of a lot easier for VM to keep up with cloned modems. I have no idea how they'll handle it but they should be able to tell which UBR the modem should be on, which one(s) it is on (if cloning is possible). Since cloning these modems requires physical access VM may be able to do something to the original subsciber, the very least I can think of is to terminate their service for modding / reverse engineering / cloning their equipement. I guess we'll see how it plays out. But in theory, if it stays secure, in a few years when everything is on Docsys 3.0 specs and 20mb is the 'slow service' cloned modems will not exist. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Technology Forums
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: sbhacker.net
Posts: 974
Thanks: 2
Thanked 251 Times in 173 Posts
|
Believe me i know what im talking about.
docsis 3 uses BPI+ like docsis 2 and 1.1 had, however its now required by default and cant be disabled. to pass bpi+ you need a mac address and its matching signed cert, which is stored in the modems nonvol. to clone a modem you would need physical access to the modem to dump the chip. the encryption isnt going to be broken as its RSA. |
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Bad_Ad84 For This Useful Post: | martin-f (20-01-09) |
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Leeds
Posts: 1,125
Thanks: 46
Thanked 95 Times in 84 Posts
|
Quote:
Cheers
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Cable modems | lost_boy | Eurovox | 9 | 14-12-08 06:43 PM |
| seting up 2x 20m cable modems on one computer! | matthew4321 | Cable Modems | 39 | 21-11-08 11:42 PM |
| where to get modems to flash? | shreksta | Cable Modems | 6 | 31-10-08 08:47 PM |
| LinkBack |
LinkBack URL |
About LinkBacks |
| Bookmark & Share |
Digg this Thread! |
Add Thread to del.icio.us |
Bookmark in Technorati |
Tweet this thread |
