<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Techwatch: Tech News &#187; Emails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/tag/emails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk</link>
	<description>Digital &#38; Satellite TV, 3DTV, HDTV, IPTV, Computers, Mobiles, Gaming, Internet, and Telecoms</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 10:35:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>LulzSec says it won&#8217;t publish Murdoch emails</title>
		<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2011/07/22/lulzsec-says-it-wont-publish-murdoch-emails-after-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2011/07/22/lulzsec-says-it-wont-publish-murdoch-emails-after-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 12:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emma Woollacott</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet News: Broadband, Telecoms, Social Networks, ISP's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT Security News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LulzSec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news international]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techwatch.co.uk/?p=38903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The LulzSec hacking group has backtracked on promises to release 4GB of emails from News International and the royal family. LulzSec initially promised to release the emails this week, claiming to have acquired them during its hack of the Sun &#8230; <a href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2011/07/22/lulzsec-says-it-wont-publish-murdoch-emails-after-all/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2011/07/22/lulzsec-says-it-wont-publish-murdoch-emails-after-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Hotmail glitch affected 17,000 users</title>
		<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2011/01/04/microsoft-hotmail-glitch-affected-17000-users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2011/01/04/microsoft-hotmail-glitch-affected-17000-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren Allan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet News: Broadband, Telecoms, Social Networks, ISP's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techwatch.co.uk/?p=33681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft has posted up an apology regarding the Hotmail glitch which struck on December 30th, and resulted in the deletion of many users emails and folders. The problem occurred globally, and Microsoft said that over 17,000 customers were affected in &#8230; <a href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2011/01/04/microsoft-hotmail-glitch-affected-17000-users/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2011/01/04/microsoft-hotmail-glitch-affected-17000-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10% of UK websites guilty of spamming visitors</title>
		<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2010/10/24/10-of-uk-websites-guilty-of-spamming-visitors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2010/10/24/10-of-uk-websites-guilty-of-spamming-visitors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 17:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren Allan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet News: Broadband, Telecoms, Social Networks, ISP's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Malware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techwatch.co.uk/?p=32182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research conducted by the Spam Ratings site has shown that one in ten UK websites hit their visitors with “dangerous and malicious” spam. The study took place over the course of a year and involved monitoring some 10,000 websites and &#8230; <a href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2010/10/24/10-of-uk-websites-guilty-of-spamming-visitors/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2010/10/24/10-of-uk-websites-guilty-of-spamming-visitors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Millions of pounds lost through online fraud</title>
		<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2010/06/02/millions-of-pounds-lost-through-online-fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2010/06/02/millions-of-pounds-lost-through-online-fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 11:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet News: Broadband, Telecoms, Social Networks, ISP's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emails]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techwatch.co.uk/?p=25404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite organisations running days of action against online and other fraud, the loses experienced by the UK public are claimed to be running at a massive £3.5 billion per year! The day of action took place on the 1st June &#8230; <a href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2010/06/02/millions-of-pounds-lost-through-online-fraud/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2010/06/02/millions-of-pounds-lost-through-online-fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spam should be deleted</title>
		<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2010/05/11/spam-should-be-deleted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2010/05/11/spam-should-be-deleted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 09:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer News: Hardware, Tablet PC's, Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techwatch.co.uk/?p=24441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Businesses and IT managers should make sure they are deleting spam on a regular basis according to Rik Ferguson, a senior security technician with the security and software firm Trend Micro. It is being suggested that users who see emails &#8230; <a href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2010/05/11/spam-should-be-deleted/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2010/05/11/spam-should-be-deleted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ninety two per cent of all email is SPAM</title>
		<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/07/31/ninety-two-per-cent-of-all-email-is-spam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/07/31/ninety-two-per-cent-of-all-email-is-spam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet News: Broadband, Telecoms, Social Networks, ISP's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer News: Hardware, Tablet PC's, Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techwatch.co.uk/?p=9534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been found that ninety two per cent of all email is now Spam according to research carried out by the computer security firm McAfee, which has claimed that the growth of Spam in the past three months is &#8230; <a href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/07/31/ninety-two-per-cent-of-all-email-is-spam/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/07/31/ninety-two-per-cent-of-all-email-is-spam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Empty emails bypass spam filters</title>
		<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/05/08/empty-emails-bypass-spam-filters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/05/08/empty-emails-bypass-spam-filters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 08:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet News: Broadband, Telecoms, Social Networks, ISP's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techwatch.co.uk/?p=7311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spam filters have done a great job in stopping lots of spam from getting into the computer user&#8217;s inbox. Most computer users have spam filters and although some spam may get through, a vast amount of spam is blocked. Yet &#8230; <a href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/05/08/empty-emails-bypass-spam-filters/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/05/08/empty-emails-bypass-spam-filters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government and Phorm in contact over legal issues</title>
		<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/04/29/government-and-phorm-in-contact-over-legal-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/04/29/government-and-phorm-in-contact-over-legal-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet News: Broadband, Telecoms, Social Networks, ISP's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phorm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techwatch.co.uk/?p=7050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Home Office has been accused of working with the targeted advertising firm Phorm over whether its advertising solution was legal. The Home Office totally denies that it has colluded with Phorm, but according to the Lib Dem Home Affairs &#8230; <a href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/04/29/government-and-phorm-in-contact-over-legal-issues/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/04/29/government-and-phorm-in-contact-over-legal-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New email law provokes complaints</title>
		<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/01/12/new-email-law-provokes-complaints/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/01/12/new-email-law-provokes-complaints/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet News: Broadband, Telecoms, Social Networks, ISP's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techwatch.co.uk/?p=4154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New security rules, which will mean that internet service providers have to keep details of all emails sent in the UK, are being hailed as a waste of cash and will probably clash with civil liberty rules too. Currently ISPs &#8230; <a href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/01/12/new-email-law-provokes-complaints/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/01/12/new-email-law-provokes-complaints/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax rebate email warning</title>
		<link>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/01/09/tax-rebate-email-warning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/01/09/tax-rebate-email-warning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 11:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Allen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Tech News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet News: Broadband, Telecoms, Social Networks, ISP's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techwatch.co.uk/?p=4131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many taxpayers are receiving emails which look as if they come from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), at a time when they might expect to hear from HMRC, with the 31 January deadline for self assessment drawing closer. These emails &#8230; <a href="http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/01/09/tax-rebate-email-warning/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.techwatch.co.uk/2009/01/09/tax-rebate-email-warning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

